| Comparison Criteria | Adnetik | Campaign Average |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per Booking | $2.47 | $7.75 |
| Return on Investment | $54:$1 | $34:$1 |
| Conversion Rate | .0533% | .0478% |
| Impression Ratio | 1,877 | 3,478 |
| Click-thru Rate | .04% | .04% |

* graph shows only the top six providers
Objective: A regional player in the hospitality market wanted to drive more hotel bookings through their website. More importantly, they wanted to do so more cost-effectively than their current placement methods, while better influencing downstream revenue.
Setup: Adnetik was placed on a single campaign, in which we were compared against 23 other providers. We received 4% of the clients total media budget for the test.
Result: Despite having a small piece of the pie, Adnetik ranked 2nd out of all 24 providers for cost per booking (CPB) and ROI. By using AIM, Adnetik was able to generate 7% of total campaign bookings with 4% of the media budget, compared to our closest competitor, who produced 11.7% of total campaign bookings with 13% of the budget. This client has since shifted a greater portion of their media budget to Adnetik for upcoming campaigns.
| Comparison Criteria | Adnetik | Campaign Average |
|---|---|---|
| Cost per Action | $30.00 | $43.60 |
| Cost per Click | $0.62 | $3.71 |
| Conversion Rate | .0037% | .0016% |
| Impression Ratio | 26,775 |
60,931 |
| Click-thru Rate | .06% | .04% |

Objective: A regional telecom company was looking to add new customers and increase purchases of new cell phone plans through digital marketing.
Setup: Adnetik was given a portion of the media budget and was tested against a traditional DSP and Ad Network.
Result: Adnetik’s AIM boasted the highest conversion rate and lowest cost-per-action (CPA) of all three providers. Cost-per-click (CPC) was also significantly lowered from their previous efforts, as was the impression-to-conversion ratio. Once again, Adnetik’s innovative process proved more efficient and gave better results than either of our competitors.